Survival paradox between stage IIB/C and stage IIIA colon cancer: is it time to revise the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system?

INTRODUCTION: A survival paradox between T4N0 (Stage IIB/IIC) and Stage IIIA colon cancer exists, even after adjusting for adequate lymph node (LN) retrieval and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (C). We conducted a large hospital-based study to re-evaluate this survival paradox based on the newest 8th edition staging system. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried to evaluate 35,606 patients diagnosed with Stage IIB, IIC, and IIIA colon cancer between 2010 and 2017. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare unadjusted overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association of stage with hazard ratios adjusted for relevant demographic and clinical variables including ≥ 12 LNs retrieved and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 5-year OS for optimally treated stage IIIA colon cancer (receipt of C) was 84.3%, which was significantly higher than stage IIB/C (≥ 12 LNs retrieved + C) (72.8%; P < 0.0001). Stage was an independent predictor of OS. Among optimally treated Stage IIIA patients, T1N1 had the best survival (90.6%) while stage T4bN0 (stage IIC) had the worst (70.9%) (P < 0.0001). Compared to stage IIB, stage IIC had a 17% increased risk of overall death while stage IIIA had a 21% reduction in death (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Stage IIB/C and Stage IIIA survival paradox persists even after accounting for receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and adequate lymph node retrieval. Future iteration of the TNM system should take this paradox into consideration.

Rural versus urban commuting patients with stage III colon cancer: is there a difference in treatment and outcome?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if there are differences in outcomes for patients with stage III colon cancer in those from urban vs. rural commuting areas. METHODS: Data were evaluated on patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 2012 and2018 from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Patients were classified into rural and urban groups. Data on overall survival, time from diagnosis to surgery and time from surgery to chemotherapy, and sociodemographic factors (including race, age, and poverty level) were recorded. RESULTS: Of 2652 patients identified, 2159 were urban (81.4%) and 493 rural (18.6%). No age difference between rural and urban patients (p = 0.56). Stage IIIB accounted for 66.7%, followed by IIIC (21.6%) and IIIA (11%), with a significant difference between rural and urban patients based on stage (p = 0.02). There was no difference in the extent of surgery (p = 0.34) or tumor size (p = 0.72) between urban and rural settings. No difference in undergoing chemotherapy (p = 0.12). There was a statistically significant difference in receiving timely treatment for hospital volume (p < 0.0001) and poverty level (p < 0.0001), but no difference in time from diagnosis to surgery (p = 0.48), and time from surgery to chemotherapy (p = 0.27). Non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to receive timely treatment when compared with non-Hispanic Whites for both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, (aHR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97), respectively. There was no difference in Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves comparing rural vs. urban patients (p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in overall survival, time to surgery, and time to adjuvant chemotherapy between rural and urban patients with Stage III colon cancer.

Value-based focused global population health management.

In 2018, approximately 18 million people worldwide were diagnosed with cancer and are predicted to double by 2040. The global quality chasm in improving health care worldwide requires "systems thinking" as the key to success. Aligning the goal around person-centered care captures the total needs of care of a population and not just disease categories. The integration of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six aims of quality termed "value-based focused" and population health management (PHM) provides all health care leaders grappling with improving the health care of the populations a framework for the communities they serve. In this context, the question becomes finding solutions to providing high quality, compassionate and patient-centered health care delivery. Over the last two decades, three paradigms have emerged; the six aims of quality, outcome-focused population health, and the "Quadruple Aim". We have termed the intersection of these concepts as Value-based focused Population Health Management (VBPHM). This review applies VBPHM across the geographic county and community levels in the United States. Specifically, we examine VBPHM at the county or county-equivalents and community levels within the United States. Lastly, the potential role of Community-based Participatory Research and it is applicability to our framework is discussed. VBPHM can comparably be applied globally to improve population health, especially in preventing and treating cancer better.

A discussion of the gut microbiome's development, determinants, and dysbiosis in cancers of the esophagus and stomach.

The microbiome refers to a population of microbes that colonize the skin, nasopharynx, oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital tract. The human microbiome consists of bacteria, archaea, fungi, viruses, and phages. Recent advances in genomic sequencing have catalyzed a deeper understanding of complex microbe-microbe and host-microbe interactions. Dysregulation of these interactions, or dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal tract, has been implicated in a growing list of pathologies including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, depression, Parkinson's disease, autism, and various gastrointestinal cancers. Gastric and esophageal cancer, for example, continue to remain as two of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, therefore there is an increased emphasis on investigating the role of dysbiosis on these cancers. In this review, we discuss the development and structure of the gut microbiome, its homeostatic and dysbiotic mechanisms, and the key microbes in esophageal and gastric carcinogenesis with a focus on bacterial biology. Further clarification of these pathways and discovery of diagnostic or therapeutic targets could have broad impacts on global subpopulations. It is important to understand the nature of the gastrointestinal tract microbiome and its potentional risk factors for dysbiosis in order to tailor its application to the individual patient and create an era of highly personalized, precision medicine.

Value-based chronic care model approach for vulnerable older patients with multiple chronic conditions.

"Old age, itself, is not a disease" (Suborne 2007). The rising rate of the global aging population is predicted to create a health care crisis within the next three decades. Vulnerable older adults suffer from multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) in addition to cognitive and physical decline during the process of aging resulting in an inability to optimally achieve self-management. In terms of resource utilization, complex inpatient, and outpatient care results in higher physician visits, polypharmacy, and higher prescription costs. Health literacy has become known as an important social determinant of health affecting the older population. Both reductions in health literacy and self-management are associated with poorer health outcomes. The patient activation measure (PAM) has been coined "a vital sign" to ascertain a patient activation level throughout the continuum of care with the introduction of an intervention's progress. In this review, we conceptualize a systematic approach of the development of a "tailored" integrated community and care team to develop a partnership in assisting senior adults with MCCs. Through this intervention the value-based chronic care model (CCM) and PAM allows for an adaptable integration between the activated patient, their caregivers, and the community. The Model for Improvement (MFI) serves as a well-recognized technique for developing and executing quality improvement strategies in this "tailored" engaged and activated individual and community care team approach in achieving health outcomes and quality of life among the vulnerable older adult population worldwide.

Esophageal cancer: the rise of adenocarcinoma over squamous cell carcinoma in the Asian belt.

Esophageal cancer is a common cancer worldwide with a high associated mortality rate. Amongst the two most frequent subsets of disease, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC), there has been an epidemiologic shift towards adenocarcinoma over the last few decades. However, squamous cell carcinoma still predominates worldwide. Within Western countries, obesity has been associated with an increase in esophageal AC. A striking report from the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that worldwide obesity has tripled since 1975. In 2016, the WHO reported that greater than 1.9 billion adults are overweight and over 650 million were obese. In this review our goal is to analyze the esophageal cancer trends of China, which is the largest contributor among the esophageal cancer "Asian belt." Our intent is to evaluate whether there is a correlation between the rise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and obesity in this esophageal cancer "hotspot." With further analysis, the high-risk populations that are identified can be targeted to implement preventative strategies. This focus will aid in decreasing the burden of esophageal cancer at the global health level by addressing preventative strategies, such as screening endoscopy and lifestyle modifications. For example, WHO developed a global action plan on physical activity in response to the rise in obesity worldwide. Prevention is key to decreasing the rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma as majority of cases are diagnosed in the late stages leading to high mortality rates.

Implications of the growing incidence of global colorectal cancer.

The expanding worldwide burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant public health issue. Understanding the shift in the geo-demographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and biogenetic distribution of CRC is paramount. The Human Development Index (HDI) measuring life expectancy, education, and gross national income is a composite index comparing health outcomes between countries. This has been shown to be a useful comparison tool in measuring the health dimension among high, middle, and low-income countries. CRC has a wide global distribution in incidence and mortality with majority of cases occurring in countries with a high or very high HDI. However, in developing countries and in those undergoing rapid socioeconomic growth, there has also been a marked rise in CRC rates as well. This pattern is noted globally and seems to correlate with increase in a country's specific HDI. Additionally, another unique pattern of CRC incidence has emerged with more cancers being diagnosed in adults younger than 50 years old. Further investigation is needed to determine CRC risks reduction and implementation of primary prevention and early detection strategies within different country specific healthcare systems. Globally, improvement in healthcare equality, access to medical care and screening for CRC particularly in resource-limited (low HDI) countries is essential.

Social determinants of health associated with poor outcome for rural patients following resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of rurality on outcome for patients who had resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unclear. We hypothesize that poor outcomes for rural patients are associated with adverse social determinants of health (SDoH). The objective of this study is to assess the difference in overall survival (OS) of PDAC patients between rural, urban, and contributing factors. METHODS: A cohort of 25,536 patients diagnosed with stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2003 to 2011 and underwent resection were evaluated from the National Cancer Database. Socioeconomic/demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment variables were compared between rural and urban residences. The 5-year OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to assess factors associated with OS. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the rural residence was a predictor of poor OS. The 5-year OS for rural (N=4,389) and urban (N=21,147) was 18.8% (95% CI: 17.4-20.2%) and 22.3% (95% CI: 21.6-22.9%; P<0.0001), respectively. The risk of all causes of death was 10.3% higher (P<0.0001) in rural than urban patients. In multivariable analysis, rurality was not an independent predictor of OS (P=0.407). Independent predictors of worse OS included adverse social determinants of health associated with the rural population and these included a low income (P<0.0001), low education level (P<0.01), low insurance status (P<0.01), and treatment at a low-volume facility (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rural/urban outcome disparities for resected stage I-III pancreatic cancer outcome can be explained by adverse social determinants of health associated with rural population.

Treatment at a high-volume academic research program mitigates racial disparities in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities have long been a subject of concern between patients afflicted with pancreatic cancer in the United States. We believe that, in addition to a high-volume center, treatment at an academic research program (ARP) will mitigate racial outcome disparities. METHODS: A total of 12,950 patients diagnosed with stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2003-2011 and at ACS Commission on Cancer (COC) accredited facilities [e.g., high-volume (≥12 cases/year) ARPs] were evaluated from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Sociodemographic, clinicopathological, and treatment variables were compared between Black (N=1,127) and White (N=11,823) patients. The Kaplan-Meier Estimator and Cox Proportional Hazards Model were used for survival analysis. P value ≤0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Black patients had a significantly higher overall survival (OS) than White patients, despite having a significantly lower household income, lower education level, more stage III disease, more Medicaid recipients, and higher comorbidity index (P<0.05). The 5-year unadjusted OS (28.6% versus 23.9%, a median survival time (months) was (25.2 versus 23.7 months for Black and White patients, respectively (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in surgical margin status or receipt of chemoradiation between the two cohorts. After adjusting for covariates, race was no longer a significant predictor of OS (P=0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at a high volume, ARP can mitigate racial disparities in pancreatic cancer.

Positive impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on Louisiana women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Louisiana is one of the few Southern states that enacted the Medicaid expansion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). To the authors' knowledge, the issue of how this has affected the breast cancer landscape in Louisiana is unknown. The authors have postulated that ACA expansion had a positive impact for Louisiana women diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: Data from the Louisiana Tumor Registry regarding 14,640 women aged 20 to 64 years who resided in Louisiana and were diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0 to stage IV breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. The study period was divided into 2 groups: 1) before ACA expansion (January 1, 2012-May 31, 2016); and 2) after ACA expansion (June 1, 2016-December 31, 2018). The chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of ACA expansion. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: After ACA expansion, the rate of uninsured patients decreased from 5.4% to 3.0% (P < .0001), and the rate of Medicaid recipients increased from 11.6% to 17.7% (P < .0001). The diagnosis of stage I breast cancer increased from 36.8% to 44.7% (P < .0001), whereas the diagnosis of stage III breast cancer decreased from 10.7% to 8.5% (P < .0001). The receipt of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery increased from 81.2% to 84.0% (P = .0035), and the receipt of radiotherapy within 90 days increased from 57.2% to 61.7% (P = .0012). After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables, the models demonstrated that ACA expansion decreased the uninsured rate by 48% (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43-0.63), increased the diagnosis of early-stage disease (stage0 to stage II) by 27% (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.41), increased receipt of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery by 19% (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37), and reduced the delay of receipt of radiotherapy by 16% (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: ACA expansion in Louisiana reduced the uninsured rate, increased the diagnosis of early-stage disease, and increased access to treatment.

Pancreatic cancer stem cells in patient pancreatic xenografts are sensitive to drozitumab, an agonistic antibody against DR5.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence are two major hurdles in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Recent findings suggest that both of these attributes are associated with a small subset of pancreatic tumor initiating cancer stem cells (CSCs). Here, we demonstrate that drozitumab, a human agonistic monoclonal antibody which binds the death receptor DR5, selectively eliminates CSCs, resulting in tumor growth inhibition and even regression of pancreatic tumors. METHODS: To examine the efficacy of drozitumab against pancreatic CSCs, we treated patient-derived pancreatic tumor xenografts (PDX) in immunocompromised SCID mice and evaluated tumor control. To assess apoptosis following drozitumab treatment, we identified the CSCs as CD24+, CD44+, and EpCAM+ by FACS analysis, and measured in vivo and in vitro levels of cleaved caspase-3. Lastly, in vitro evaluation of DR5 re-expression was performed using isolated patient pancreatic cancer xenograft cells along with the cell line, Panc-1. After treatment with drozitumab, the remaining DR5- cells were assessed by FACS analysis for DR5 expression at the cell surface at 8, 24 and 48 h post-treatment. All in vivo growth data was analyzed by 2-way Anova, incidence data was analyzed using Mantel-Cox, and in vitro studies statistics were performed with a t-test. RESULTS: We find that while 75-100 % of CSCs express DR5, only 25 % of bulk tumor cells express the death receptors at any one time. Consequently, drozitumab treatment of SCID mice bearing PDX kills higher percentages of CSCs than bulk tumor cells. Additionally, SCID mice implanted with isolated CSCs and then immediately treated with drozitumab fail to ever develop tumors. In vitro studies demonstrate that while drozitumab treatment reduces the DR5+ cell population, the remaining tumor cells begin to express DR5, suggesting a mechanism by which continuous administration of drozitumab can ultimately result in tumor regression despite the initially low percentage of DR5+ cells. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our work reveals that treatment of pancreatic tumors with the drozitumab can lead to long-term tumor control by targeting both bulk cells and CSCs.

Metastatic colon cancer from extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presenting as painless jaundice: case report and literature review.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of the biliary epithelium comprising only about 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. It is a highly aggressive malignancy and confers a dismal prognosis with majority of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Metastatic CCA to the colon is extremely rare with only few cases reported in the literature. We present a 61-year-old patient with incidental synchronous metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma from extra-hepatic CCA. Laboratory data revealed significant indirect hyperbilirubinemia and transaminitis. Imaging study showed intrahepatic bile ducts prominence without mass lesions. Incidentally, there was diffuse colonic thickening without mass lesions or obstruction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed a common bile duct stricture. Brushings were consistent with CCA. Screening colonoscopy identified nodularity and biopsy and immunostaining were consistent with CCA metastasis to colon. The patient elected for palliative and comfort care. Metastatic CCA to the colon is a rare pattern of distant spread that may pose a diagnostic challenge. Some salient characteristics may assist in the differentiation of primary colon cancer and metastatic colon cancer from CCA. Little remains known about the pathogenic behavior of metastatic secondary colorectal cancer. And more so, the management approach to such metastatic cancer still remains to be defined. Screening colonoscopy in patients presenting with resectable CCA may alter management. Furthermore, whether patients with history of resected CCA may benefit from a more frequent screening colonoscopy remains to be validated.

Tumor priming by Apo2L/TRAIL reduces interstitial fluid pressure and enhances efficacy of liposomal gemcitabine in a patient derived xenograft tumor model.

Interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) is elevated in tumors and high IFP, a negative cancer prognosticator, is known to limit the uptake and efficacy of anti-tumor therapeutics. Approaches that alter the tumor microenvironment and enhance uptake of therapeutics are collectively referred to as tumor "priming". Here we show that the cytotoxic biological therapy Apo2L/TRAIL can prime the tumor microenvironment and significantly lower IFP in three different human tumor xenograft models (Colo205, MiaPaca-2 and a patient gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma tumor xenograft). We found that a single dose of Apo2L/TRAIL resulted in a wave of apoptosis which reached a maximum at 8h post-treatment. Apoptotic debris subsequently disappeared concurrent with an increase in macrophage infiltration. By 24h post-treatment, treated tumors appeared less condensed with widening of the stromal areas which increased at 48 and 72h. Analysis of tumor vasculature demonstrated a significant increase in overall vessel size at 48 and 72h although the number of vessels did not change. Notably, IFP was significantly reduced in these tumors by 48h after Apo2L/TRAIL treatment. Administration of gemcitabine at this time resulted in increased tumor uptake of both gemcitabine and liposomal gemcitabine and significantly improved anti-tumor efficacy of liposomal gemcitabine. These results suggest that Apo2L/TRAIL has a potential as a tumor priming agent and provides a rationale for developing a sequencing schema for combination therapy such that an initial dose of Apo2L/TRAIL would precede administration of gemcitabine or other therapies.

Appropriateness of systemic treatments in unresectable metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

AIM: To evaluate systemic treatment choices in unresectable metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and provide consensus treatment recommendations. METHODS: Systemic treatment options for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors have expanded in recent years to include somatostatin analogs, angiogenesis inhibitors, inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin and cytotoxic agents. At this time, there is little data to guide treatment selection and sequence. We therefore assembled a panel of expert physicians to evaluate systemic treatment choices and provide consensus treatment recommendations. Treatment appropriateness ratings were collected using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process. After studying the literature, a multidisciplinary panel of 10 physicians assessed the appropriateness of various medical treatment scenarios on a 1-9 scale. Ratings were done both before and after an extended discussion of the evidence. Quantitative measurements of agreement were made and consensus statements developed from the second round ratings. RESULTS: Specialties represented were medical and surgical oncology, interventional radiology, and gastroenterology. Panelists had practiced for a mean of 15.5 years (range: 6-33). Among 202 rated scenarios, disagreement decreased from 13.2% (26 scenarios) before the face-to-face discussion of evidence to 1% (2) after. In the final ratings, 46.5% (94 scenarios) were rated inappropriate, 21.8% (44) were uncertain, and 30.7% (62) were appropriate. Consensus statements from the scenarios included: (1) it is appropriate to use somatostatin analogs as first line therapy in patients with hormonally functional tumors and may be appropriate in patients who are asymptomatic; (2) it is appropriate to use everolimus, sunitinib, or cytotoxic chemotherapy therapy as first line therapy in patients with symptomatic or progressive tumors; and (3) beyond first line, these same agents can be used. In patients with uncontrolled secretory symptoms, octreotide LAR doses can be titrated up to 60 mg every 4 wk or up to 40 mg every 3 or 4 wk. CONCLUSION: Using the Delphi process allowed physician experts to systematically obtain a consensus on the appropriateness of a variety of medical therapies in patients with PNETs.

Influence of the implantation site on the sensitivity of patient pancreatic tumor xenografts to Apo2L/TRAIL therapy.

OBJECTIVES: We have previously demonstrated activity of Apo2L/TRAIL against patient pancreatic tumor xenografts. Here, we have examined the influence of the tumor implantation site on therapeutic response of orthotopic tumors and their metastases to Apo2L/TRAIL. METHODS: Sensitivity of 6 patient pancreatic tumor xenografts to Apo2L/TRAIL was determined in a subcutaneous model. To compare the response of orthotopic tumors, cells from subcutaneous xenografts were injected into the pancreas. Tumor growth was confirmed by histological examination of selected mice, and then treatment was started. When all control mice developed externally palpable tumors, the experiment was terminated, and pancreatic weights compared between control and treated groups. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantitate the response of orthotopic and metastatic tumors. RESULTS: The sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL observed in subcutaneous tumors was maintained in orthotopic tumors. Metastatic spread was observed with orthotopic tumor implantation. In an orthotopic model of a sensitive tumor, primary and metastatic tumor burden was significantly reduced, and median survival significantly extended by Apo2L/TRAIL therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that the site of tumor engraftment does not alter the inherent sensitivity of patient xenografts to Apo2L/TRAIL, and these results highlight the potential of Apo2L/TRAIL therapy against primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Evaluation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) activation involves the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and plays an important role in cell survival signaling in pancreaticobiliary cancer. EGFR gene mutations have been correlated with clinical response to EGFR inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study examined the prevalence of PIK3CA and EGFR mutations in pancreaticobiliary cancer where erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor, is approved for therapy. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreaticobiliary carcinoma were identified. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor and adjacent normal tissue, and exons 9 and 20 (for the PIK3CA gene) and exons 18-21 (for the EGFR gene) were amplified by PCR and sequenced. Literature review on EGFR and/or PIK3CA mutations in pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas was conducted. RESULTS: No mutations in either PIK3CA or EGFR genes were identified. The study identified one synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs1050171) in the coding region of EGFR. A previously unreported change, suspected to be a SNP, was observed in intron 18 of EGFR (IVS18+15, C>T). Review of the literature showed EGFR mutation rate of 2% and 10.5% in pancreatic and biliary tract carcinomas, respectively. PIK3CA mutations were found in 3.6% and 11.7% of pancreatic and biliary tract carcinomas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A low prevalence of EGFR or PIK3CA mutations exists in pancreatic cancer (<5%), indicating that mutation screening may not be as useful in determining prognosis or response to targeted inhibition.